Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Araujo, L G, Piña, A B S, Aidar, L A G, Coelho, G O and Carvalho, M T M (2019) Recommendations and guidelines for implementing PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 262–76.

Dabarera, G, Perera, B and Rodrigo, M (2019) Suitability of public-private-partnership procurement method for road projects in Sri Lanka. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 199–213.

Hartwell, J C, Upadhyay, Y and Sourani, A (2019) Influential factors of life cycle management in education PFI projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 302–14.

Jayasuriya, S, Zhang, G and Jing Yang, R (2019) Challenges in public private partnerships in construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 172–85.

Kavishe, N, Chileshe, N and Jefferson, I (2019) Public–private partnerships in Tanzanian affordable housing schemes. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 233–47.

Marinelli, M (2019) Evaluation of PPP road projects in Greece. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 186–98.

Oliveros-Romero, J and Aibinu, A A (2019) Ex post impact evaluation of PPP projects: an exploratory research. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 315–30.

Pellegrino, R, Carbonara, N and Costantino, N (2019) Public guarantees for mitigating interest rate risk in PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 248–61.

Umar, A A, Zawawi, N A W A and Abdul-Aziz, A (2019) Exploratory factor analysis of skills requirement for PPP contract governance. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 277–90.

Zhang, Y and Tan, W (2019) The leading small group: an institutional innovation for PPP projects in China. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 291–301.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Governance; Public–private partnership; Institution; Coordination; Project management; Infrastructure management;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 2044-124X
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-12-2017-0132
  • Abstract:
    It is widely recognized that large-scale public–private partnership (PPP) projects require an effective coordination mechanism among various stakeholders throughout the project life cycle. The purpose of this paper is to provide an insight into how this may be achieved through the leading small group (LSG), which is a distinctive informal Chinese institution for coordination among various public agencies. Design/methodology/approach An in-depth case study using secondary data and five in-depth interviews with two staff members from the developer and three government officials involved is used to probe into how the LSG functions during the various development phases of the Yangzhou Teda Waste-to-Energy project. Findings The main finding is that, conditional on its capacity, the LSG coordinated various public agencies to promote fast project implementation and ensure its smooth operation by making high-level decisions, facilitating quick permits and approvals, and mitigating the risks. However, formalization and participation from other stakeholders are needed to ensure good governance. Research limitations/implications Because it is an exploratory case study, the findings cannot be readily generalized. Further research can be done to compare the performance of LSGs in different Chinese cities and PPP projects. Practical implications It is supposed that this paper can provide implications of designing effective coordination mechanisms for managing large-scale PPP projects. Originality/value This paper provides an account of the LSG as a distinctive Chinese coordination mechanism that has been rarely studied.

Zhao, N and Ying, F (2019) Method selection: a conceptual framework for public sector PPP selection. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 214–32.